Talk:Lion-class battleship/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk • message • contribs • count • logs • email)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Any idea if the completed guns were ever used (for coastal artillery, railway guns, etc.?) Parsecboy (talk) 16:57, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Any possibility of scanning a line-drawing in from Conway's/Garzke & Dulin/etc.? Fair Use should be applicable here. Parsecboy (talk) 16:57, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Looks good for GA to me.